Iga Swiatek has expressed her disagreement with comparisons between her doping case and those of fellow players Simona Halep and Jannik Sinner, asserting that each situation is unique. The world No. 2’s comments follow the announcement in late November that one of her samples from August tested positive for trimetazidine (TMZ). Swiatek received a provisional suspension but successfully argued that the banned substance was ingested due to contamination in a melatonin medication she was taking.
The International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA) accepted her explanation, resulting in a symbolic one-month ban after determining she “bore no significant fault or negligence” in the incident.
In contrast, Jannik Sinner faced two positive tests for clostebol in March but quickly clarified the circumstances surrounding the results. His explanation was accepted by the ITIA, allowing him to avoid any suspension.
Simona Halep, the former world No. 1, tested positive for Roxadustat in October 2022. After a lengthy battle to clear her name, her case was ultimately resolved by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), which reduced her initial four-year suspension to nine months. Halep has publicly criticized the ITIA, claiming she was treated unfairly compared to other players.
Swiatek addressed the issue during an appearance on TVN24, stating, “I know that people need to automatically compare such situations to others that have already happened, but the truth is that each of these cases is completely different. The process of proving innocence will also be different. It’s hard to compare me to Sinner, to Halep, to Kamil Majchrzak, because each of us is struggling with a different problem.”
She emphasized that the handling of each case lies in the hands of the ITIA, expressing her trust in their objectivity: “My fate, just like the fates of others, was in their hands. I trust that this process is objective, that everything is done according to the regulations and no one judges a player differently because of their position.”
Halep, however, reacted strongly to the news of Swiatek’s case being resolved in her favor. Throughout her own ordeal, she has claimed to have provided ample evidence to clear her name, accusing the ITIA of ignoring her and attempting to “destroy” her reputation.
In an Instagram post, Halep questioned the disparity in treatment: “I stand and ask myself, why is there such a big difference in treatment and judgement? I can’t find a logical answer. It can only be bad will from ITIA, the organization that has done absolutely everything to destroy me despite the evidence.”
Days later, Halep expressed her distress over the handling of Swiatek’s case, stating, “Big pain, big pain. I felt like they [the ITIA] were unfair to me before, but now it’s even more. I was so upset and sad when I saw the situation. It’s just unacceptable, from my point of view. I lost my sleep again… All the negative thinking, negative thoughts, it’s not easy to handle.”
Halep specifically criticized the ITIA for not publicly announcing Swiatek’s doping news until the case was resolved, further fueling her feelings of injustice. While Halep continues to voice her dissatisfaction, Swiatek remains confident in her innocence and the legitimacy of her case.
Related topics
- Which five tennis courts are the most difficult to play
- What Is the Highest Paying Tennis Tournament
- What Does G and S Mean in Tennis
