The decision to abolish FA Cup replays from the first round onwards, announced on Thursday, has sparked controversy and criticism from lower-division clubs. The English Football League (EFL) has voiced its concerns, stating that the move marginalizes smaller clubs and takes away a traditional revenue stream.
According to the EFL, the new format was agreed upon solely between the Premier League and the Football Association (FA), without formal consultation with all stakeholders. The FA, however, asserts that discussions have been ongoing for over a year and that the decision was made in the interest of strengthening all competitions while considering player welfare.
The Prime Minister’s office has weighed in on the matter, acknowledging the importance of David and Goliath fixtures in the magic of the cup. Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer also criticized the decision, emphasizing the role of replays in the tradition of the FA Cup.
Numerous clubs from the EFL and lower down the football pyramid have condemned the move, expressing disappointment and calling for immediate suspension of the changes pending a thorough consultation with all stakeholders. Clubs like Exeter, Notts County, Barrow, and Tranmere have all voiced their opposition, lamenting the loss of a part of English football’s soul.
In response, the FA defended its decision, stating that the calendar for next season was approved by the Professional Game Board, which includes representatives from both the EFL and the Premier League. The FA also highlighted increased broadcast revenue for EFL and National League teams and emphasized ongoing discussions on prize money for the FA Cup.
Despite the FA’s explanation, criticism continues to mount, with Coventry manager Mark Robins describing the decision as a “kick in the teeth.” Manchester United manager Erik ten Hag and Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta expressed sadness over the impact on British football culture and player welfare, respectively. However, Manchester City boss Pep Guardiola acknowledged the challenges faced by lower-division clubs but supported the changes, citing the demanding schedule for teams participating in European competitions.
